| Author |
Date Added (PST) |
Subject |
ALIEN 
|
2/15 10:17pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Marty there were doctored photos
on that show were someone have removed little chunks of the
black grid used in the photo for refference. (job anyone could
do with photoshop)
What makes you think everything in
that show was represented correctly? A show like that would
thrive on mis-quotes and 3rd party doctored photos.
Date Edited: 2/15
10:17pm (1 edits total) Edited
By: ALIEN
-----signature-----
E = ps2
Entertainment =
PlayStation Squared
|
| Hitokage
|
2/15 10:17pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
017A: NO LIGHT DOES NOT EXERT
ANY SIGNIFICANT FORCE ON YOU NO MATTER WHERE YOU ARE. GO BACK
TO PHYSICS CLASS.
Also, all of you are forgetting
that it's not a perfect vacuum on the moon.
-----signature-----
"If you can't tell reality from
imagination, you still have some way to go."
- Kagato,
Tenchi Muyou: RyouOuKi ep 6
GA since July 1999
|
| opa-opa
|
2/15 10:18pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| What I'm wondering is, if the
whole moon landing was fake, why did they even bother to spend
15+ years and billions of dollars to build those huge Apollo
rockets? Why even bother? They could have just launched some
empty small rocketship into space and tell us that there are
actually people in it when there wasn't.
-----signature-----
"I spread truth... like disease!" -
Chief Blank, Space Channel 5
|
| 017A
|
2/15 10:19pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Hitokage:
http://earthsky.com/2000/es000109.html
|
| opa-opa
|
2/15 10:20pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
The only reason I would think
the moon landing was fake, is the fact that these days it
seems like even with our supercomputers we can't even launch a
friggin shuttle without a ton of problems, I find it hard to
believe that back in 1969 they actually had the technology to
send a manned capsule billions of miles to the moon.
Date Edited: 2/15
10:20pm (1 edits total) Edited
By: opa-opa
-----signature-----
"I spread truth... like disease!" -
Chief Blank, Space Channel 5
|
| simplee
|
2/15 10:20pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
OK ALIEN I getcha.
I
suppose I DO need more to discount what has been accepted as
historical fact but, on the contrary, do you accept all of the
"official" history of the United States?
If so YOU are
the one who is deluding himself.
For all the people
who get all knee-jerk spastic over others who have the guts to
question the authoritative view of history, I suggest reading
Howard Zinn's "The People's History of the United States". It
was referenced in the film "Good Will Hunting" and as the
character said "THAT book will knock you on your f*ckin' A$$!"
|
| ALIEN
|
2/15 10:21pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| Oompa that's the whole point.
They wouldn't do that. They actually did go to the moon. The
coverup is actually more complex than actually going to the
moon itself.
-----signature-----
E = ps2
Entertainment =
PlayStation Squared
|
| MonsterThrilla
|
2/15 10:22pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Thompson,
Its apparent
that you refuse to believe that this really happened. I don't
know. I've presented you with evidence straight from NASA and
you twisted it to fit your hoax theory. You didn't even quote
the whole sentence:
"The main objectives of the
Surveyors were to obtain close-up images of the lunar surface
and to determine if the terrain was safe for manned landings."
Its in plain English. Ehh, whatever mate...
Marty,
I think it was just a case of
mistaken archiving. Mislabeling, misplacing, etc. That could
account for the shot of the hill with one astronaut and then
the shot of the same hill with two. But I do admit, those two
shots of the valley area, one with the LEM and the other one
completely bare and untouched, well, I just don't know. One
could have been doctored. But I did get a shiver down my spine
when I saw that...
-----signature-----
Webmaster and Owner of http://www.wolfensteinonline.com/ "It's
perfect violent for rape fight."-VenturisXXX "So, fuckface
gona take on my offer or not?" -Gasara to opa-opa |
| Hitokage
|
2/15 10:24pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| 017A: What you are forgetting is
that you need to have an intense and COHERENT bean of photons
to push an object to any significant degree. Light from the
sun is not coherent. Momentum is transfered at random
directions in random magnitudes. The only significant effect
of such radiation is heat, caused by the increase in random
kinetic energy from it.
-----signature-----
"If you can't tell reality from
imagination, you still have some way to go."
- Kagato,
Tenchi Muyou: RyouOuKi ep 6
GA since July 1999
|
| Gasara
|
2/15 10:25pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| I have just one question. If it
was fake then why nasa bothered to 'stage' all the other
missions, when noone watched them anymore?
|
| simplee
|
2/15 10:26pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Did I mention that this board
ROCKS?
I don't know another board on the net with as
many intelligent debators who argue without digressing into
stupid infantile insults.
|
| ALIEN
|
2/15 10:26pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Certainly not simplee, but one
has to draw the line somewhere. And I've seen what hollywood
can do with the best special effects money can buy today
(which is about a million times what the best money could buy
back then). And special effects pale in comparison to the
simplest scene of reality as seen through the camera.
I'm saying right now, we couldn't fake the lunar
landing as real as there are represented on that old dusty
film even if all of hollywood combined. At least not yet.
Give us a few years and maybe computer graphics will
be able to do it.
Date Edited: 2/15
10:32pm (1 edits total) Edited
By: ALIEN
-----signature-----
E = ps2
Entertainment =
PlayStation Squared
|
| MonsterThrilla
|
2/15 10:26pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
simplee,
I've read that
book. Or parts of it at least. I know American history like
the back of my hand. And because of that, I can truly say that
the Apollo missions were, and probably will always be, the
single greatest service to humanity America as an individual
nation will ever accomplish.
-----signature-----
Webmaster and Owner of http://www.wolfensteinonline.com/ "It's
perfect violent for rape fight."-VenturisXXX "So, fuckface
gona take on my offer or not?" -Gasara to opa-opa |
| Tella
|
2/15 10:28pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| Can we please move on to
something less controversial like the Warren Commission
findings.
-----signature-----
"OK, you are da man. " - GA staffer
hails Tella
|
| Hitokage
|
2/15 10:31pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| simplee: I'm just acting asinine
because I'm upset that I need to be arguing down to this level
at all. Talk to me about quantum theory or something, and I'll
be much much more rational with you. ;)
-----signature-----
"If you can't tell reality from
imagination, you still have some way to go."
- Kagato,
Tenchi Muyou: RyouOuKi ep 6
GA since July 1999
|
| Death
|
2/15 10:32pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Marty,
The two images I
thought were odd were the one with the LEM sitting there with
the hills in the background and then one without it and the
same background. WHAT the HECK!?
I believe we landed
on the moon, but that was a bit odd I must say.
death
-----signature-----
http://www.stavesacre.com/ - best band
ever ------------------------------------------ "Why,
that would require some sort of RE-Bigulator" - Prof. Frink
"I am mature and stuff." - MD-IRONMAN
|
| simplee
|
2/15 10:32pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
opa-opa said:
"why did
they bother spending 15+ years and billions of dollars to
build those huge rockets"
I approach the other side
with as much skepticism as the conspiracy side.
Number
one, anyone paying close attention to the political going's on
in this country could tell you how the defence industry is a
prime way to funnel public taxpayer dollars into the hands of
the wealthy. Most of our defense budget (and the so called
"foreign aid" budget) is nothing more than state subsidies to
high technology firms.
I can see the point of spending
all that money; It funnels money into the hands of the people
who own the congress AND it convinces the Soviets that the
game is over.
|
| 017A
|
2/15 10:32pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Hitokage:
If you are
still not convinced, I think we can calculate how much
momentum is transferred from the sun to the flag. That is if
you want. As far as the flag on the moon is concerned the 8
light-minute distance from the sun to the moon is as good as
infinity if you want something of beam behavior.
This
is what we'll need:
1) The amount of energy that the
sun is generating.
2) The relationship between a
photon and energy and momentum. This is the one that might be
hard to find. I don't think I have any of my old textbooks on
me right now.
I'm sure you know how to do the rest
from here on. I'm pretty sure this will work. Like I said, I'm
not too bright. This might even prove that you're right. Who
knows?
EDIT: We'll also need some sort of frequency
number on the radiation coming from the sun. If we try and
take into account all frequencies, it might get a little
hairy. I also won't know how to do it, either.
Date Edited: 2/15
10:35pm (1 edits total) Edited
By: 017A
|
| Death
|
2/15 10:34pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
The part that made me laugh was
when they introduced Area 51. You knew it was coming. Any good
conspiracy theory involved Area 51. :) Cow mutilation, crop
shapes, urinary infections, etc...
death
-----signature-----
http://www.stavesacre.com/ - best band
ever ------------------------------------------ "Why,
that would require some sort of RE-Bigulator" - Prof. Frink
"I am mature and stuff." - MD-IRONMAN
|
| Tella
|
2/15 10:35pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
| Frick the moon. What about Mars?
I mean the day some one actually goes there will people be
like--Real or ILM (Industrial Light & Magic)? Besides
what's the deal with the face and pyramids there? I mean who
cares if there is water frozen a jillion feet below the
surface if there is proof of a civilization once there.
-----signature-----
"OK, you are da man. " - GA staffer
hails Tella
|
| simplee
|
2/15 10:36pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
I haven't seen you be asinine
Hitokage!
I'm lovin' this
|
| Gasara
|
2/15 10:36pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
"I can see the point of spending
all that money; It funnels money into the hands of the people
who own the congress AND it convinces the Soviets that the
game is over."
But you simply have to just be stupid
to pull off a stunt like that during the peek of the Cold War.
The ruskies would have surely overan this country if it were
fake. I'm sure that they monitored the Apollo program and the
capsules very closely. They could have easily tell if it was
fake or real.
|
| ALIEN
|
2/15 10:37pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
People actually went to all the
trouble of building a rubber alien dummy and releasing a film
saying it was a real autospy.
I think a couple of
doctored photos aren't out of the question.
-----signature-----
E = ps2
Entertainment =
PlayStation Squared
|
| RipnYouOff
|
2/15 10:37pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Questions : Someone please read
these:
-------------------------------------
A)
Can everyone agree that NASA lied at least once? The show
showed two clips one taken one day...and another nasa claimed
to be miles away. Obvoiusly the same landscape. Any
explination for that, or is that damning evidence that NASA
has been less than truthfull?
B)Another example of
this was one NASA photo w/ lunar equipment in it(Im talking
about the peice left over from the lunar lander)...and another
picture without it, in the same landscape. Impossible. Is
there an explination for that?
C)The cross hairs...the
cross hairs were in the camera itself, so they should have
fully been over everything in the pics. But some were behind
some objects, proving that some photos were edited. Any
explination for this?
D)The lighting in the photos are
damning enough for me. Does anybody go skiing? Ever take a
photo in backlight? The person you are shooting is a black
figure when you get the pic back. "Well, the moons reflection
lit them". If the reflection from ski slopes is not enough to
light up a subject on earth...the moons grey reflection
wouldn't be enough up there...especially as well as they were
lit.
E)This is very important. When the astronaut
stepped into the COMPLETELY BLACK SHADDOW... HE WAS STILL LIT.
IF THERE WAS ENOUGH TO LIGHT HIM UP...THE SHADOW WOULD NOT
HAVE BEEN COMPLETLY BLACK!
Somebody, please...disprove
these points. Point A...simply cannot be disproven, there is
no excuse for that one. Thanks,
Mike
Date Edited: 2/15
10:39pm (1 edits total) Edited
By: RipnYouOff
|
| Strider_Hiryu
|
2/15 10:39pm |
RE: OT: The moon landing probably
*was* fake... |
Speaking of ROCKS, what is your
rebuttal against the genuineness (yes that is the correct
word) of the moon rocks they brought back?
Check here:
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/proof.html
And thats just one page of this site: http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
which is pretty good.
-----signature-----
My Stridey Sense is TINGLING!
|
